Centralized operations • Operate by exception

More assets. Fewer operators. The operator cannot keep it all in their head. OSM sees the state. Buddy triggers action. Memory Lanes keep what worked.

Give the operator the state, the next check, and the prior response without hunting through PI, alarms, SOPs, or shift notes.

Start With One Recurring Problem See How It Works
One operating event
State change Production degrading

Pressure down. Flow down.

↓
OSM State confirmed

Workflow triggered.

↓
Buddy Check outlet restriction.

The operator gets the situation and the next check.

State History Next check
↓
Operator action Work the exception

Action taken in the workflow.

↓
Memory Lane What worked retained

Recovery verified. The outcome stays with the asset.

State → Workflow → Action → Outcome → Memory
80% less alarms/day/operator
75% remote startups
94.5% production efficiency
71K BOE downtime avoided
Historical OPX integrated operations results.
OPX AI operating experience includes
Three questions in the moment

When something changes, the operator needs three answers.

Not another dashboard. Not another search.

OSM
What is happening?
Determine the operating state and what changed.
Operating state
Producing → Degrading
→
Memory Lane
Have we seen this before?
Bring forward the relevant prior event, action and outcome.
Similar event found
Prior action retained
Outcome verified
→
Buddy
What do I do next?
Trigger the workflow and prompt the operator with the next check.
Workflow active Check outlet restriction.
State
→
Prior context
→
Operator action
→
Validated outcome
Existing tech vs missing

You already have the systems. Operating memory bridges them.

The stack records signals, alarms, work and notes. It still does not retain one governed operating episode from state change through outcome.

What you already have

Systems of record

These systems matter. They just were not built to retain the full operating episode together.
PI / Historian signals and trends
SCADA / Alarms changes and alerts
CMMS work performed
SOPs approved method
Shift Logs operator notes
Engineering decision rationale
What you still need

One Memory Lane around one recurring event.

This is the missing operational record: what happened, what was decided, what was done, and whether it worked.
State Production degrading

What is happening operationally?

Decision Restriction suspected

What did the team conclude?

Action Valve position corrected

What was actually done?

Outcome Pressure stabilized

Did the recovery hold?

Next time, this is not a new investigation. The operation starts with the prior state, response and validated outcome.
This is what you buy first. Start with one recurring operating problem where lost context, repeated work or slow response is already costing you money.
One Memory Lane. One recurring problem.
One event. Closed loop.

From changed state to validated outcome.

The operator should not have to rebuild the story before they can work the problem.

Example: production degradation
Recurring operating event
OSM

State changes.

The asset moves from normal production into a degrading state.

Operating state PRODUCTION DEGRADING
→
Memory Lane

Prior context appears.

The operator does not start from zero.

Similar event found
Prior action retained
Outcome known
→
Buddy

Workflow triggers.

Buddy puts the next check in front of the operator.

Next check Check outlet restriction.
→
Operator + outcome

Action is validated.

The response is completed and the operating result is measured.

Verified outcome Pressure stabilized
Next time, the operation starts with experience. The state, decision, action and measured outcome become reusable operational memory.
STATE → ACTION → OUTCOME → MEMORY
Start with the operating problem

Where are you already paying for the problem?

OPX fits into operating priorities that already have an owner, a cost and a reason to act.

◎
IOC / ROC

Operate more assets by exception.

What the operation wants
Better shift continuity
Clear exception ownership
Finding to closure
!
Alarm to action

Get from alarm to owned response.

What the operation wants
Fewer nuisance alarms
Faster abnormal response
Clear operator priorities
↗
Remote operations

Move work off the windshield.

What the operation wants
Remote startups
Visit by exception
Fewer unnecessary truck rolls
↺
Production recovery

Stop solving the same event from scratch.

What the operation wants
Faster trip recovery
Less repeat troubleshooting
Lower downtime exposure
↓ Truck rolls
↓ Downtime
↑ Shift continuity
↑ Response speed
↑ Production efficiency
Pick the operating fight that matters most. The first engagement scopes one recurring problem, one measurable operating cycle and the first Memory Lane around it.
One problem first